|
displaying posts 1 to 9 of 9
| Author | Subject: 2.1 + suoercharger |
 eliotrw
Seasoned Pro  Location: Southwark Registered: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 4,864 Status: Offline |
Post #1
Is there any reason not to supercharge a 2.1 conversion, or is it even possible? DiscussAm considering having that done tbh. After I refresh every last bit if suspension ________________________________________ Ex- Phase 3 China GTi-6 T-Reg |
 Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 21:32
|
|
|
smegal
Seasoned Pro  Location: Leeds Registered: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 5,940 Status: Offline |
Post #2
It depends on how high your compression ratio is. ________________________________________ Ex SC-6Now in a Megane R26 |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 21:34
|
|
|
welshpug!
Capt Pedantic  Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,817 Status: Offline |
Post #3
no reason why it can't be done, though with the power gains you get from just the standard 2.0 there's no point really.________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 21:34
|
|
|
eliotrw
Seasoned Pro Location: Southwark Registered: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 4,864 Status: Offline |
Post #4
Surely you would have epic torque though? Any educated guesses as to what you would end up power wise________________________________________ Ex- Phase 3 China GTi-6 T-Reg |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 21:38
|
|
|
phillipm
Seasoned Pro  Location: Rotherham Registered: 15 Oct 2006 Posts: 20,607 Status: Offline |
Post #5
5% more than a 2.0?Not a lot... ________________________________________ - Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM meEmail me! Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces. |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 21:40
|
|
|
eliotrw
Seasoned Pro Location: Southwark Registered: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 4,864 Status: Offline |
Post #6
So its a no then? Would it be more reliable? I.e under less stress when making the same power?________________________________________ Ex- Phase 3 China GTi-6 T-Reg |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 21:49
|
|
Rich E
Forum Admin Location: Hertfordshire Registered: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 7,757 Status: Offline |
Post #7
No, re-boring that far will increase the risk of engine failure.You'll gain a little power and torque yes, but assuming you're taking about low boost it'll add about £1k to the cost (machining, pistons, mapping, etc.) ________________________________________ Rich |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 22:07
|
|
|
welshpug!
Capt Pedantic Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,817 Status: Offline |
Post #8
indeed, you might as well go high boost if youre opening it up.________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
|
Posted 10th Aug 2011 at 22:07
|
|
|
matty_rallye
Senior User  Location: Devizes Registered: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 966 Status: Offline |
Post #9
If you were going to go to the extent of changing the crank then for supercharging purposes you would be better off going for the 2.1 td crank and getting almost 2.2 with 87mm pistons?________________________________________ 2.1 16v 306 Rallye. |
|
Posted 11th Aug 2011 at 00:20
|
|
The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.
Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.