|
| Author | Subject: How do they get 280bhp out gti6 engine? |
 welshpug!
Capt Pedantic  Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,817 Status: Offline |
Post #26
you don't need an aftermarket crank for 280, but you do need to build it well.280 from an XU is more like 10k+ ready to run, easily looking at 6k in parts on their own. ________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
 Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 16:55
|
|
|
superchargedblack1997gti6
Seasoned Pro  Location: guildford Registered: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 2,376 Status: Offline |
Post #27
I thought that the original crank wasn't much good over 8k rpm for extended periods Mei? would have said for 280bhp would need to be revving to 8.5-9k ish?________________________________________ Super high boost Completed, destroyer of gearboxes and 160mph club |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 17:01
|
|
|
jimmyhackers
Seasoned Pro  Location: birmingham Registered: 14 Jun 2011 Posts: 1,090 Status: Offline |
Post #28
get some noscant really see any other way to get 280 except lying through your teeth ________________________________________ the world is changed by people in sheds |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 17:40
|
|
|
mr west
Senior User  Location: herts Registered: 13 Sep 2010 Posts: 742 Status: Offline |
Post #29
How about one of those electric superchargers?? ________________________________________ white rallyecherry dead rallye s16 |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 17:46
|
|
|
blandy
Seasoned Pro  Location: Bucks Registered: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 2,437 Status: Offline |
Post #30
jimmyhackers wrote: get some nos cant really see any other way to get 280 except lying through your teeth You can get what figures you like if your prepared to pay for it |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 18:32
|
|
|
phillipm
Seasoned Pro  Location: Rotherham Registered: 15 Oct 2006 Posts: 20,607 Status: Offline |
Post #31
jimmyhackers wrote: get some nos cant really see any other way to get 280 except lying through your teeth 280bhp is possible. Your wallet would be a lot lighter too, even better power/weight. ________________________________________ - Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM meEmail me! Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces. |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 18:35
|
|
|
welshpug!
Capt Pedantic Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,817 Status: Offline |
Post #32
Build it right and it wont need to go to 9.________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 18:40
|
|
|
phillipm
Seasoned Pro Location: Rotherham Registered: 15 Oct 2006 Posts: 20,607 Status: Offline |
Post #33
You wouldn't be far away, certainly be easier if you were pushing 9krpm.________________________________________ - Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM meEmail me! Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces. |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 18:49
|
|
|
welshpug!
Capt Pedantic Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,817 Status: Offline |
Post #34
Colins current sb engine is 272 @8k. But more importantly 191lbft @6500 and 150 at 3k________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:02
|
|
|
ryangti6
Seasoned Pro  Location: Pontypool Registered: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 1,839 Status: Offline |
Post #35
I've not seen curves etc but matts (pug1off) headline figures aren't that far off a maxi, how you can call that s**t I don't as to me that's quite impressive especially considering the amount of r+d that would of gone into building a maxi lump. Credit where credits due imo.________________________________________ Ryan |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:15
|
|
|
phillipm
Seasoned Pro Location: Rotherham Registered: 15 Oct 2006 Posts: 20,607 Status: Offline |
Post #36
welshpug! wrote: Colins current sb engine is 272 @8k. But more importantly 191lbft @6500 and 150 at 3k Yup, but it's dropping off at 8krpm, so to chase that extra bit of power you'd be making it a bit peaky without having some extra revs to go at. ________________________________________ - Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM meEmail me! Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces. |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:25
|
|
|
blandy
Seasoned Pro Location: Bucks Registered: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 2,437 Status: Offline |
Post #37
Trouble is its a forum and people are biased either way but I totally agree at the end of the day I've seen cars running with pug1off engines and sandy brown engines and tbh they all look fantastic and no doubt they were all made for different purposes etc |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:25
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #38
Supercharge to over 450bhp, no need to worry about revving over 8k then.  Also no need to gas flow head, buy different cams etc. You're all good to go.  ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone  |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:34
|
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #39
atterz wrote: Why is there a picture of a gimp in Stans avatar anybody? Im confused. It's a pic of my bike with me standing next to it.  ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:35
|
|
|
pete_rallye
Seasoned Pro  Location: Yorkshire Registered: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 5,253 Status: Offline |
Post #40
stan_306gti6 wrote: Supercharge to over 450bhp, no need to worry about revving over 8k then. Also no need to gas flow head, buy different cams etc. You're all good to go. Yawn. Play a different tune Stan! For people that want to actually compete in there cars NA is the only option unless you want to race in the open classes which have everything from radicals to 1000bhp evos in them, which make a 450bhp 306 look a bit silly. On a circuit a high revving, high power engine is what you want, because you can learn what gear to be in and when and keep it on song all the time, so in that case a 300bhp 9k rpm engine is going to be quicker than a 8krpm 270bhp engine because you're using the power, not the torque. However to drive an engine like that does cost a lot in rebuilds, and its f**king tiring to boot, and if you drop off cam you can watch the entire field pass you whilst you change down a gear or wait for it to pull again. For less energetic drivers, and generally speaking rallying too, a torquey engine isn't going to be much slower but will be easier to drive as the revs can drop a bit and the engine will still pull, hence often someone will find they are quicker with a torquier (sp?) engine than with a high rpm engine as its easier for them to drive and keep in the power zone. That is my theory anyway, and I'm usually correct. ________________________________________ Oulton Park in a BTCC 306 vid 1Oulton Park in a BTCC 306 vid 2 Lap of the 'ring |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:56
|
|
|
atterz
Seasoned Pro  Location: Stafford Registered: 18 Feb 2011 Posts: 1,134 Status: Offline |
Post #41
stan_306gti6 wrote: atterz wrote: Why is there a picture of a gimp in Stans avatar anybody? Im confused. It's a pic of my bike with me standing next to it. F*ck sorry mate!!! My screen is really dark on my laptop.  ________________________________________ owain wrote: A GTI-6 with a good dashboard and the seats down can outsprint an E46 M3 in July. |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 19:58
|
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #42
atterz wrote: stan_306gti6 wrote: atterz wrote: Why is there a picture of a gimp in Stans avatar anybody? Im confused. It's a pic of my bike with me standing next to it. F*ck sorry mate!!! My screen is really dark on my laptop. No problem mate!  ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone |
|
Posted 28th Aug 2013 at 20:00
|
|
|
allanallen
Seasoned Pro  Location: Buxton Registered: 01 May 2007 Posts: 1,399 Status: Offline |
Post #43
superchargedblack1997gti6 wrote: I thought that the original crank wasn't much good over 8k rpm for extended periods Mei? would have said for 280bhp would need to be revving to 8.5-9k ish? Was this info from the same thread that said the limit for standard rods is 300bhp??  ________________________________________ www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 04:56
|
|
|
superchargedblack1997gti6
Seasoned Pro Location: guildford Registered: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 2,376 Status: Offline |
Post #44
allanallen wrote: superchargedblack1997gti6 wrote: I thought that the original crank wasn't much good over 8k rpm for extended periods Mei? would have said for 280bhp would need to be revving to 8.5-9k ish? Was this info from the same thread that said the limit for standard rods is 300bhp?? Nope but to be fair I'm talking about for track use on occasional use in the supercharged cars it has been proved fine. but for high power NA where you sit at high revs 90% of the time I'd be concerned using the standard crank there must of been a reason all the Longman engines used steel cranks? not a cheap option  ________________________________________ Super high boost Completed, destroyer of gearboxes and 160mph club |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 08:06
|
|
|
allanallen
Seasoned Pro Location: Buxton Registered: 01 May 2007 Posts: 1,399 Status: Offline |
Post #45
superchargedblack1997gti6 wrote: allanallen wrote: superchargedblack1997gti6 wrote: I thought that the original crank wasn't much good over 8k rpm for extended periods Mei? would have said for 280bhp would need to be revving to 8.5-9k ish? Was this info from the same thread that said the limit for standard rods is 300bhp?? Nope but to be fair I'm talking about for track use on occasional use in the supercharged cars it has been proved fine. but for high power NA where you sit at high revs 90% of the time I'd be concerned using the standard crank there must of been a reason all the Longman engines used steel cranks? not a cheap option There's a few about spinning in excess of 8.5k reliably, I'm yet to see a reliable 280bhp longman engine..... Have you heard of any actually failing? ________________________________________ www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 08:26
|
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #46
I'm running a standard crank developing 320ft/lbs and 454bhp, although it's obviously boosted.However, it still revs to 8k, which I feel is enough. ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 08:36
|
|
|
superchargedblack1997gti6
Seasoned Pro Location: guildford Registered: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 2,376 Status: Offline |
Post #47
No i haven't seen a failure but seems an excessive waste of 2k to put them in if there's no need.Stan i know what you're saying and agree the supercharged conversion revs to 8k but you don't have to sit there all the time to feel the power you prob make 280bhp at 6-7k so no need to wind it right round. I did ask My engine builder and he said no need for a steel crank! but that's supercharged not NA. ________________________________________ Super high boost Completed, destroyer of gearboxes and 160mph club |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 08:41
|
|
|
rallyeash
Seasoned Pro  Location: Devizes Registered: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 4,424 Status: Offline |
Post #48
Use a steel diesel crank and get one for about £75!________________________________________ 230 hp 2.1 16v XU 205 rallye on jenveys Project thread here309 3dr K20 Type R |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 08:57
|
|
|
dangti6
aka JKshooter  Location: Taunton, Somerset Registered: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 10,305 Status: Offline |
Post #49
280bhp N/A vs 450bhp charged. Which would be more fun to drive and which would feel faster?  ________________________________________  |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 09:21
|
|
|
welshpug!
Capt Pedantic Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,817 Status: Offline |
Post #50
280 for sure ________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
|
Posted 29th Aug 2013 at 10:04
|
|
The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.
Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.