Jenvey Questions - Engines Forum - Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club

displaying posts 1 to 9 of 9

Author

Subject: Jenvey Questions

Stuwee

Senior User

Location: st albans

Registered: 27 Jun 2007

Posts: 739

Status: Offline

Post #1

Just have a few questions regarding swapping Jenvey bodies from an s16 (RFT) to a gti6 (RFS) engine.

1.Is the inlet body itself interchangeable between the two cylinder heads??

2.What sort of power gains are there to be had with jenvey's on a standard/fast road cam'd 6 engine??

3.The s16 is running an EFI ECU and i was wondering weather the ECU on a Gti6 (RFS) engine can be altered to run Jenvey bodies??

Just gathering idea's together at the moment on what to do.

Stuart

________________________________________

Ph1 Cossack 6

Posted 5th Jul 2011 at 02:47

Profile

cjm_harris

Seasoned Pro

Location: Parts for Sale section

Registered: 04 Dec 2007

Posts: 7,442

Status: Offline

Post #2

stuwee1983 wrote:

1.Is the inlet body itself interchangeable between the two cylinder heads??

When I bought my throttle bodies from Jenvey the manifold was listed as an Mi16, so if it fits that and a gti6 head, would guess it would fit yours.

stuwee1983 wrote:

2.What sort of power gains are there to be had with jenvey's on a standard/fast road cam'd 6 engine??

With some half decent cams and jenveys you should see around 200-210 bhp.

stuwee1983 wrote:

3.The s16 is running an EFI ECU and i was wondering weather the ECU on a Gti6 (RFS) engine can be altered to run Jenvey bodies??

The standard ECU can be remapped by the likes of Wayne, but why not use the EFI ECU?

________________________________________

Chris
1999 China Gti6 Supercharged Devil

[Fun car] >>Project Thread<<
2000 Bianca 306 Diesel [Work runabout]

Posted 5th Jul 2011 at 03:20

Profile

daveyboy

aka Jim Davey

Location: Southampton

Registered: 01 Oct 2007

Posts: 8,648

Status: Offline

Post #3

I have a brand new Jenvey maniofold in a box, yours for �100 delivered.

________________________________________

R H Davey Welding Supplies. I sell new and used welding equipment in the Hampshire area. I take on welding jobs in the evenings, ally casting repairs are one of my specialities but I can weld pretty much anything. PM me with your requirements.

Some of my services: (See my for sale threads)
Engine mount/chassis repair
Solid Beam Mounts BACK IN PRODUCTION
Harness bars

Posted 5th Jul 2011 at 19:58

Profile

pugjim

Seasoned Pro

Location: Sheffield

Registered: 11 Mar 2007

Posts: 1,380

Status: Offline

Post #4

jenvey Inlet manifold is the same for the s16/mi16 and gti6.

I would use the EFI ecu from the s16 as it will already have a good base map for the gti6 engine to get it up and running then have it mapped properly after.

Posted 5th Jul 2011 at 23:36

Profile

Stuwee

Senior User

Location: st albans

Registered: 27 Jun 2007

Posts: 739

Status: Offline

Post #5

Thanks for the info.

The s16 engine currently is putting out 185 to 195 Bhp(preivous owners quotes). She does not feel she has got that at the moment Sad

.
Hesitation and over fueling are the main issues.

If you are only able to squeeze around 200-210 Bhp out of a cammed RFS engine then i might just stick with the s16 lump until my pockets gets deep enough to go down the major engine internals mods/Sc route.

Rolling road and re map here i come Ninja

________________________________________

Ph1 Cossack 6

Posted 6th Jul 2011 at 05:17

Profile

Stuwee

Senior User

Location: st albans

Registered: 27 Jun 2007

Posts: 739

Status: Offline

Post #6

More questions.....

I have 45mm jenvey's with 48 length trumpets running euro 1 efi ecu and i presume original bosh injectors off the avac set up on the S16.

Basically i now want to put these bodies on a standard RFS lump, i do not have a massive budget and cannot afford another �1000 on pistons and cams.

Any ideas on the power gains on a standard RFS engine Unsure

I also presume i would need to upgrade the injectors so any recommendations??

If there is anything i have missed which i need to do to make this transplant a success please let me know.

Thanks

________________________________________

Ph1 Cossack 6

Posted 1st Aug 2011 at 03:07

Profile

will130787

Seasoned Pro

Location: Reading

Registered: 24 Sep 2009

Posts: 3,933

Status: Offline

Post #7

I don't think there is a huge amount of gains on a standard rfs engine bud, bit the noise Smile

Still undecided what to do as mentioned at pugfest?! I would get the s16 mapped properly Wink

________________________________________

Ex Astor 6 owner Sad

Also an Ex owner of a Bianca 6 Sad

Now an ex owner of a 2005 9-3 2.0T 210bhp Aero Swedish Saloon thing!! Soon to be 250bhp.... Superman

Now driving Mk5 Golf GTTdi, mile muncher

But still live for the 306 Ninja

Posted 1st Aug 2011 at 03:17

Profile

welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,817

Status: Offline

Post #8

get it mapped properly and a decent exhaust inc manifold if it hasn't already, they do perform quite close to the rfs when built up properly (most maxi's ran RFY based engines)

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 1st Aug 2011 at 03:32

Profile

Stuwee

Senior User

Location: st albans

Registered: 27 Jun 2007

Posts: 739

Status: Offline

Post #9

Yes it has got a 4 branch manifold,piper 272 fast road cams and the 6 gearbox to boot.

I have been told she is running 185+ but she has shown not be any faster than a 6 LOL

My main thought was instead of faffing about with re maps and other issues that i have found is to start fresh with a standard RFS lump but if the power gains are only improve BHP to circa 180 then it is not worth the hassle of the swappage.

________________________________________

Ph1 Cossack 6

Posted 1st Aug 2011 at 04:35

Profile

All times are GMT. The time is now 16:10

Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.