Post #26
ok point taken, thanks for the help.
|
displaying posts 26 to 31 of 31
Pages (2): 1 [2]
| Author | Subject: 2.1 |
 pugheaven
Seasoned Pro  Location: Fareham Registered: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 4,602 Status: Offline |
|
 Posted 24th Jun 2010 at 16:42
|
|
|
binkagti
Seasoned Pro  Location: canterbury Registered: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 2,411 Status: Offline |
Post #27
Ollie, why do you want to get to 2.1?You know my engine is 2044cc and that seems to work, just curious mate ________________________________________ TEAM Supercharged Rallye |
|
Posted 24th Jun 2010 at 17:15
|
|
|
pugheaven
Seasoned Pro Location: Fareham Registered: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 4,602 Status: Offline |
Post #28
what crank are you usin? Colin suggested it to me as that is what he was/is planning on doin. More torque i guess? |
|
Posted 24th Jun 2010 at 18:10
|
|
|
binkagti
Seasoned Pro Location: canterbury Registered: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 2,411 Status: Offline |
Post #29
Standard crank i think, but i am running prob around 350 ft / lbs? do you need more? Good luck dude, ________________________________________ TEAM Supercharged Rallye |
|
Posted 24th Jun 2010 at 23:03
|
|
|
pugheaven
Seasoned Pro Location: Fareham Registered: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 4,602 Status: Offline |
Post #30
not usin the same turbo as you so i wont get the same power! Only wantin 300hp, bein different as well. |
|
Posted 25th Jun 2010 at 11:13
|
|
|
oldbrownshoe
Seasoned Pro  Location: Holon Israel Registered: 08 Aug 2008 Posts: 1,795 Status: Offline |
Post #31
jarrus464 wrote: Could be good, but lighter isn't always better though mate  I think there might be a good reason why PSA went back to cast iron over alloy the reason is the shit alloy PSA used to build the block with, very sensitive to coolants so they need to develop special liquid. bobdylan_55 wrote: bigger stroke but shorter con-rod will give lower compression. reason pug went back to cast is because its probably stronger and puts the weight over the driving wheels which is better for traction. anybody watched the latest topgear stunt on a 207gti? they timed it, then stripped it out and timed it again and was faster standard... no , it isn't the weight should be concentrated before the wheels , not on or after the axles. what happpened in topgear is that by stripping the car they destroyed it's weight distribution. heavier car with better weight distribution handle better then lighter car with bad weight distribution, as long as the weight differences is not marginal. ________________________________________ French military victories?Did you mean French military defeats? |
|
Posted 25th Jun 2010 at 14:17
|
|
Pages (2): 1 [2]
The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.
Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.