displaying posts 1 to 21 of 21

Author Subject: Volumetric Efficiency???
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #1
Anyone know what the Volumetric Efficiency for our engines is?

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 15th Jan 2010 at 23:03
phillipm

Seasoned Pro

Location: Rotherham

Registered: 15 Oct 2006

Posts: 20,607

Status: Offline

Post #2
Peak?

________________________________________

- Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM me
Email me!
Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces.
Posted 15th Jan 2010 at 23:10
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #3
Yeah please, I'm trying to fathom out how to use a turbocharger compressor map.

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 15th Jan 2010 at 23:12
phillipm

Seasoned Pro

Location: Rotherham

Registered: 15 Oct 2006

Posts: 20,607

Status: Offline

Post #4
I've never measured it accurately but IIRC it's just under 89% around peak torque.

________________________________________

- Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM me
Email me!
Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces.
Posted 16th Jan 2010 at 00:21
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #5
How do you measure it?

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 16th Jan 2010 at 00:23
phillipm

Seasoned Pro

Location: Rotherham

Registered: 15 Oct 2006

Posts: 20,607

Status: Offline

Post #6
You need the mass airflow and the BMFC figures.

________________________________________

- Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM me
Email me!
Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces.
Posted 16th Jan 2010 at 00:25
r*byb

Regular

Location: Tamworth

Registered: 15 Sep 2007

Posts: 421

Status: Offline

Post #7
89% is good really, most performance cars now run around 80% i believe.

________________________________________

Team Low Compression
Posted 16th Jan 2010 at 01:54
phillipm

Seasoned Pro

Location: Rotherham

Registered: 15 Oct 2006

Posts: 20,607

Status: Offline

Post #8
BMW M5 peaks about 110%...

________________________________________

- Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM me
Email me!
Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces.
Posted 16th Jan 2010 at 02:49
rich_w

Seasoned Pro

Location: Havant, Hampshire

Registered: 29 Jul 2004

Posts: 5,412

Status: Offline

Post #9
Volumetric efficiency is the engines actual flow divided by the theoretical maximum flow.

As you say, 80% is a good figure to use for a modern performance engine.

If you're looking at Rotrex compressor maps - be very careful - they aren't particularly accurate. This is because Rotrex use maps straight from the compressor wheels they use in their 'chargers, which are generally derived from turbos by Holset, Garrett etc. Obviously, the same compressor wheel will vary in performance when used in a S/C compared to a turbo application.

Smile

________________________________________

Contact Details:

rich@lynxpowerengineering.co.uk
07732 822546

Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 03:52
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #10
I was looking at compressor maps for a turbocharger as a uni project. I did look at the rotrex map and was confused but I didn't give it a second thought.

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 03:56
bobdylan_55

Seasoned Pro

Location: derby

Registered: 28 Mar 2009

Posts: 1,466

Status: Offline

Post #11
be careful about if you need peak or at redline or at max power etc, peak is often mid way up the rev range.

________________________________________

309 GTi6-T
Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 04:10
rudolf

Seasoned Pro

Location: Skelmersdale

Registered: 07 Apr 2004

Posts: 2,769

Status: Offline

Post #12
phillipm wrote:
BMW M5 peaks about 110%...


rich_w wrote:
Volumetric efficiency is the engines actual flow divided by the theoretical maximum flow.



So it can't be more than 100% Dunno

________________________________________

S Reg Diablo standardsSpec SORNED
R Reg Nile standard spec written off then repaired
X Reg Astor in need of TLC
R Reg Nile to restore
Set of Lions to fit.
Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 04:58
chris with a pug

Seasoned Pro

Location: Southampton

Registered: 16 Feb 2003

Posts: 5,366

Status: Offline

Post #13
it can if the theoretical
maximum is less than actual
Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 05:34
phillipm

Seasoned Pro

Location: Rotherham

Registered: 15 Oct 2006

Posts: 20,607

Status: Offline

Post #14
rudolf wrote:
phillipm wrote:
BMW M5 peaks about 110%...


rich_w wrote:
Volumetric efficiency is the engines actual flow divided by the theoretical maximum flow.



So it can't be more than 100% Dunno


It can, google resonance supercharging Wink

________________________________________

- Bespoke rollcages/additions/adjustments. Half cages right up to complete custom spaceframes - MSA/FIA spec, CDS, ROPT, T45, etc - PM me
Email me!
Custom-made polybushes available - need an odd size or fitment? - anything from batch work to one-off pieces.
Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 05:54
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #15
bobdylan_55 wrote:
be careful about if you need peak or at redline or at max power etc, peak is often mid way up the rev range.


I'm using Steve's lecture notes and am finding the imperial calculations confusing. I was aiming for peak efficiency to be between 4-6k and am liking some form of Garrett gt2860 turbo.

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 17th Jan 2010 at 07:54
osm2121

Regular

Location: Montevideo

Registered: 02 Nov 2012

Posts: 229

Status: Offline

Post #16
Sorry to revive the thread, but didnt wanted to open an other.

Talking about resonance, this is only when the inlet has a plenum? Where the vibe rebounds back into the cyilinders in the plenum? Or with throttles bodies also matters? Cause if it doesnt have a plenum, theres no rebound back to the cylinder. I assume the shorter would be better to get rid of the resonance going out as soon as possible so it doesnt affect the air coming in. Although I´ve read in the forum, people said is the other way round, the larger the better, up to a limit. I think 370mm was said as the best measure for it, without going to a fine tune.

Im just talking without any studies or background, just wondering and wanting to know a ittle bit more about this
Posted 11th Nov 2014 at 20:52
jamiek_uk2000

Seasoned Pro

Location: Llanelli

Registered: 18 Apr 2009

Posts: 1,925

Status: Offline

Post #17
Only Rich is still in this thread from the original post. The forum is flat out!

________________________________________

205 GTi Red - G939 RTU - Died!
306 GTi 6 Diablo - Being resurrected! Project Thread

Looking for:
VTS P1 Rack
PR1.2 16"
Posted 11th Nov 2014 at 21:12
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #18
The 370mm inlet runner length was a length derived by sandy brown to give the best torque curve IIRC. No idea what resonance was like at that length though.

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 12th Nov 2014 at 22:35
pete_rallye

Seasoned Pro

Location: Yorkshire

Registered: 12 Dec 2002

Posts: 5,253

Status: Offline

Post #19
You don't need a plenum to benefit, but I have always thought it would help. Very basically the air waves that bounce of the back of the closed valves and resonate back up the inlet leave a vacuum behind them, as soon as they are out of the inlet and into open air, there is a rush of air back into the inlet to fill the vacuum, and the idea is you time this rush of air getting to the valves at the same time the valves are fully open. There is no real 'ideal' length. It depends on what cams you are using (as the valves will open at different times depending on the cams) and where you want you're power, you can alter the length to move the power up and down the rev range, although you may well see a jump in power at certain revs with a certain length.

This is how you get VE above 100% also, by using the ram effect to fill the cylinders.

________________________________________

Oulton Park in a BTCC 306 vid 1
Oulton Park in a BTCC 306 vid 2
Lap of the 'ring
Posted 12th Nov 2014 at 23:31
Puggitt

Regular

Location: New Zealand

Registered: 07 May 2012

Posts: 293

Status: Offline

Post #20
pete_rallye wrote:
This is how you get VE above 100% also, by using the ram effect to fill the cylinders.


The ram effect? Able to elaborate?
Posted 12th Nov 2014 at 23:39
pete_rallye

Seasoned Pro

Location: Yorkshire

Registered: 12 Dec 2002

Posts: 5,253

Status: Offline

Post #21
I'm speculating here but I would expect VE to be calculated using air speed calculated from piston speed and port size and the associated air velocity, and not taking into account any effect of ramming the air in caused by the above explanation. So if you can design an engine to have as close a VE to 100% as possible, the 'ram' effect caused by the above would not be included in the calculation, and so when the engine is actually run, the VE at certain points in the rev range may exceed 100%....

________________________________________

Oulton Park in a BTCC 306 vid 1
Oulton Park in a BTCC 306 vid 2
Lap of the 'ring
Posted 14th Nov 2014 at 22:35

All times are GMT. The time is now 02:14

The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.

Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.