displaying posts 1 to 25 of 39

Pages (2): [1] 2

Author Subject: Cam Advance
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #1
When my engine came out we finally had a look at the amount the cams have been advanced.

Inlet Cam


Exhaust Cam


Please note that the photos might not be 100% dead on at 90 degrees so this is just to give you an idea. I guess they can be measured - will speak to welshpug/meirion about it

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 01:22
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #2
It would be really handy if you could measure how much lift your getting at tdc. I'm looking at advancing my inlet cam a bit while its in the engine stand. I measured the standard timing on the inlet to be 0.38mm of lift a tdc, it would be nice to have an advanced figure to compare it to. Al

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 01:35
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #3
You can advance both, not just the inlet. I'll try to figure it out

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 01:43
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,817

Status: Offline

Post #4
I've got a template to stick onto the crank pulley that tells you what position its in, should be able to figure it out from that to get the number of degrees it's been altered, as well as where TDC is to get a measurement, not sure what standard lift @ TDC was.

Looking at how much space there is left in the slot (can't see it in those pictures) its a fair amount.

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 01:48
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #5
Have another look next time you're over...

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 02:00
monty-69

Senior User

Location: Colne

Registered: 02 Jul 2006

Posts: 790

Status: Offline

Post #6
Adam did you you manage to get the car on the rollers with normal and advanced timing? Does it cause the power to tail off faster after 6k?
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 02:08
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #7
adam b wrote:
You can advance both, not just the inlet. I'll try to figure it out


I was under the impression that leaving the exhaust cam more retarded would keep the the power band higher up the rev range? I believe your runs out of puff before 6k adam?

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 02:11
toddy

Newbie

Location: Sheffield

Registered: 13 Jun 2007

Posts: 29

Status: Offline

Post #8
Welshpug are you not able to measure lift @tdc with a dti?, would be a great help.

As an educated guess I expect lift @tdc for both to be around 1.35mm, assuming if/when it is measured, that mid-point of tdc is used.
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 03:08
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,817

Status: Offline

Post #9
I should be able to yes, just need to find some plate or angle to bolt my DTI to

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 03:11
ryangti6

Seasoned Pro

Location: Pontypool

Registered: 01 Sep 2006

Posts: 1,839

Status: Offline

Post #10
I should have taken a picture of my old engine before it got stripped, my inlet cam had definitly been advanced though.
Interestingly my car seemed to perform the opposite to Adams though, the power was higher up in the revs on mine and seemed to have more peak Bhp but less torque.

________________________________________

Ryan
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 06:07
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #11
allanallen wrote:
adam b wrote:
You can advance both, not just the inlet. I'll try to figure it out


I was under the impression that leaving the exhaust cam more retarded would keep the the power band higher up the rev range? I believe your runs out of puff before 6k adam?


Not at all - max power was at 6300rpm, max torque a bit lower down. It lost its cam 'kick' at 4k, just pulled straight through. I would change at 7k, but it didn't feel like it was losing power at that point.

I didn't manage to get it RR'd before as I bought it 67k without a cambelt change so it was a priority. The advancing was done at that point. Had it on a few rollers which all saw the same torque figure of 154lbft and varying power figures from 170 to 179. It wasn't a slow engine (well until its last trip out lol).

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 7th Jan 2010 at 14:56
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #12
toddy wrote:


As an educated guess I expect lift @tdc for both to be around 1.35mm,


Would advancing the exhaust cam not give less lift at TDC?

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 8th Jan 2010 at 04:26
toddy

Newbie

Location: Sheffield

Registered: 13 Jun 2007

Posts: 29

Status: Offline

Post #13
allanallen wrote:
toddy wrote:


As an educated guess I expect lift @tdc for both to be around 1.35mm,


Would advancing the exhaust cam not give less lift at TDC?


Yeah, you need to retard the exhaust cam to increase lift @ tdc.
Posted 8th Jan 2010 at 04:43
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #14
toddy wrote:
allanallen wrote:
toddy wrote:


As an educated guess I expect lift @tdc for both to be around 1.35mm,


Would advancing the exhaust cam not give less lift at TDC?


Yeah, you need to retard the exhaust cam to increase lift @ tdc.


Wasn't being anal, just trying to get it straight in my head Wink
So in adams settings the exhaust valve is probably closed at TDC ie no lift at TDC

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 8th Jan 2010 at 04:58
toddy

Newbie

Location: Sheffield

Registered: 13 Jun 2007

Posts: 29

Status: Offline

Post #15
allanallen wrote:
toddy wrote:
allanallen wrote:
toddy wrote:


As an educated guess I expect lift @tdc for both to be around 1.35mm,


Would advancing the exhaust cam not give less lift at TDC?


Yeah, you need to retard the exhaust cam to increase lift @ tdc.


Wasn't being anal, just trying to get it straight in my head Wink
So in adams settings the exhaust valve is probably closed at TDC ie no lift at TDC


I wouldn't like to guess by the pictures of Adams engine, as imo belt tension could alter the position of the tabs & Lift @ tdc this is why there is a big variation in engine outputs, purely my opinion.

The exhaust cam tab could have been closer to the pulley and they then have retarded it.

Adams has been set by Gwynne speed, who set them to Group N settings. Catcams group N cams lift were ex 1.4mm, inlet 1.35mm. Not saying that Gwynne speed use these settings but would like Welshpug to measure just to settle my own curiousity!

Disclaimer: Anyone who uses these settings and spanks their engine, does so at their own risk



Big grin
Posted 8th Jan 2010 at 05:16
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #16
Thats interesting about the catcams setting, I thought it was the norm to have quite a bit less lift on the exhaust than the inlet?

Not sure i'd be happy about running 1.4mm on standard pistons mind.

Just for the record I measured mine tonight at the standard pinned settings, I have 0.38mm inlet and 0.76mm exhaust.

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 8th Jan 2010 at 05:37
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #17
Andy can't remember exactly what he set them to as i've asked him a few times (it was nearly 4 years ago). He used to run a few 306 GTi6 Group N cars so it wouldn't surprise me that this was a regular setting. By the time I saw him he only had his Group A car left and that ran a completely different setup.

We'll measure them and let you know. I ran that engine on mostly normal unleaded for 65k miles before the head gasket went so I don't think as a modification it wil do that much damage if setup correctly. Does loads more than a filter + exhaust LOL

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 8th Jan 2010 at 14:21
toddy

Newbie

Location: Sheffield

Registered: 13 Jun 2007

Posts: 29

Status: Offline

Post #18
allanallen wrote:
Thats interesting about the catcams setting, I thought it was the norm to have quite a bit less lift on the exhaust than the inlet?


Yeah I agree some run equal but most run advanced like you say.

Presently getting my arse in gear to rebuild mine, will put it on the RR where you took your SC MI and let you know the outcome.



Posted 9th Jan 2010 at 04:06
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,817

Status: Offline

Post #19
Had a look today, both cams advanced the same amount to nearly 11 degrees! not quite fully advanced in the slot, but not far off.

Tried to get a Lift @ TDC figure and got 1.40mm, but I forgot to check whether the bottom pulley had slipped or not Doh can check that next time I'm over and confirm.

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 10th Jan 2010 at 02:39
allanallen

Seasoned Pro

Location: Buxton

Registered: 01 May 2007

Posts: 1,399

Status: Offline

Post #20
welshpug! wrote:
Had a look today, both cams advanced the same amount to nearly 11 degrees! not quite fully advanced in the slot, but not far off.

Tried to get a Lift @ TDC figure and got 1.40mm, but I forgot to check whether the bottom pulley had slipped or not Doh can check that next time I'm over and confirm.


1.4 sounds a bit risky! Obviously worked in adams case though.

Is it possible you could measure the exhaust lift aswell mei? It must be getting towards 0 lift at TDC with that much advance?

Surely it doesn't matter if the pullies slipped as your checking the lift against the crank/piston position.

________________________________________

www.bridgecraftmotorsport.co.uk

Facebook
Posted 10th Jan 2010 at 02:54
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,817

Status: Offline

Post #21
I was using the pulley as a reference point for Crank/piston position @ TDC, I printed a degree wheel with the pin hole marked on it, just forgot to check the angle from the pinned hole to the woodruff slot Doh

Didn't have anything really to stick down the plughole to show TDC Sad bit late to check on Adam's engine now as its in Pieces, but I will check on my own one as I have to sort my headgasket too Sad

This combination has certainly worked in this case, even with heavy bore wear it produced the goods.

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 10th Jan 2010 at 03:08
atterz

Seasoned Pro

Location: Stafford

Registered: 18 Feb 2011

Posts: 1,134

Status: Offline

Post #22
Sorry to drag this thread up from the past but after a good read im pretty interested in this, doesnt sound like a bad way to make some more low down torque with minimal sacrifice! What actually happened to Adams old engine?

________________________________________

owain wrote:
A GTI-6 with a good dashboard and the seats down can outsprint an E46 M3 in July.
Posted 17th Jan 2012 at 18:40
dan_s16

Seasoned Pro

Location: Cheltenham

Registered: 22 Jan 2005

Posts: 1,583

Status: Offline

Post #23
IIRC the head gasket failed between two cylinders and caused some damage to the cylinder head in the process

________________________________________

When I've got time I forget what I wanted to do, and when I remember what I wanted to do, I have no time!
Posted 17th Jan 2012 at 21:14
stan_306gti6 Forum Admin

Location: Kent

Registered: 18 Jan 2004

Posts: 21,768

Status: Offline

Post #24
Yes, that's correct, failed in a big way and wore a groove in the head.

________________________________________

"Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"
Peugeot 306 GTi-6
2000 (X), Moonstone Love
Posted 17th Jan 2012 at 21:57
atterz

Seasoned Pro

Location: Stafford

Registered: 18 Feb 2011

Posts: 1,134

Status: Offline

Post #25
Ouch, is that a case of ignoring the symptoms when its clearly gone? I did the same with my DT and it cracked the head.

________________________________________

owain wrote:
A GTI-6 with a good dashboard and the seats down can outsprint an E46 M3 in July.
Posted 17th Jan 2012 at 22:09

Pages (2): [1] 2

All times are GMT. The time is now 16:54

The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.

Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.